Ayahuasca and Human Destiny

By Dennis J. McKenna

Over the last few decades Ayahuasca has become one of the most thoroughly studied of the traditional shamanic plant hallucinogens. In his excellent and most important article, famous ethnopharmacologist Dennis J. McKenna, Ph.D., comes to the conclusion that Ayahuasca has the same message for us now that it has always had, since the beginning of its symbiotic relationship with humanity. And finally rises the crucial question: Are we willing to listen?

My good friend and colleague, Dr. Charles Grob, has extended a kind invitation to submit a contribution to this special edition of the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, devoted to the topic of ayahuasca, for which he has been selected as guest editor. I’m pleased to be asked and happy to respond, particularly since I have collaborated for many years with Dr. Grob and other colleagues who are represented here, on various aspects of the scientific study of ayahuasca. For most of the last 33 years, ayahuasca has been one of the major preoccupations of my life.

In that time, I have written extensively on the botany, chemistry, and pharmacology of ayahuasca, on its potential therapeutic uses, and on the need for more, and more rigorous, scientific and clinical investigations of this remarkable plant decoction. Working with colleagues such as Dr. Grob, my good friends Jace Callaway and Dr. Luis Eduardo Luna in Finland, my mentor Dr. Neil Towers, my late and beloved brother Terence, Dr. Glaucus de Souza Brito, and others, to investigate the myriad mysteries of ayahuasca, has been as rich and rewarding an experience as any scientist could ever hope for.

Partly as a result of our collective efforts, over the last few decades ayahuasca has become one of the most thoroughly studied of the traditional shamanic plant hallucinogens. We now have a firm understanding of the plant species that are utilized in its preparation, including the diverse pharmacopoeia of ayahuasca admixture plants, a shamanic technology unto itself that begs additional investigation. We understand the chemistry of the active constituents of its primary botanical components, and have better insight into its remarkable synergistic pharmacology.

We have identified potential therapeutic applications for ayahuasca and the role that it may some day find in healing the physical and spiritual wounds of individuals, if it is ever afforded its rightful place in medical practice. Ethnographically, my colleagues and I have made contributions to an understanding of the central role that ayahuasca already has in the context of Amazonian shamanism and ethnomedicine. We have described, and written about, its status as a window into the sacred cosmology of magic, witchcraft, transcendent experience, and healing that permeates and defines the practices of Mestizo ethnomedicine.

The visionary paintings of Peruvian shaman and artist Pablo Amaringo, brought so beautifully to the attention of the world by Dr. Luis Eduardo Luna, has helped to make that tradition accessible to many who would otherwise have seen it (if they were aware of it at all) as alien, exotic, and incomprehensible. To an extent, our work has shed some small light on the more contemporary role of ayahuasca as the sacramental vehicle of syncretic religious movements that originated in Brasil and now are reaching out globally, if incrementally, to embrace a sick and wounded world that desperately yearns for the healing that this mind/body/spirit medicine can offer.

The story of ayahuasca, and our evolving understanding of its place in the world, and of its significance for medicine, pharmacology, ethnobotany, and shamanic studies, is far from over, and in fact, it may have just begun. I would like to believe that is the case. But for the purposes of this contribution, rather than submit yet another dense and lengthy review on the botany, chemistry, pharmacology, &c., of ayahuasca, I have chosen to adopt a broader perspective, and to indulge in some reflections, and speculations on the past and future of ayahuasca of the sort that a scientist, probably mercifully, rarely shares with his colleagues or the larger world.

To those readers who may wish for my more usual nuts-and-bolts approach to the subject, I call attention to my recent review in the journal Pharmacology and Therapeutics (McKenna, 2004). In addition, a complete list of all of “my” publications on ayahuasca is appended to the end of this article; and I use the term “my” advisedly because these publications represent the work and creativity of many people with whom I’ve been privileged to collaborate over the years. They would not exist without them.

On a personal level, ayahuasca has been for me both a scientific and professional continuing carrot, and a plant teacher and guide of incomparable wisdom, compassion, and intelligence. My earliest encounters with ayahuasca were experiential; only later did it become an object of scientific curiosity, sparked in part by a desire to understand the mechanism, the machineries, that might underlie the profound experiences that it elicited.

As a young man just getting started in the field of ethnopharmacology, ayahuasca seemed to me more than worthy of a lifetime of scientific study; and so it has proven to be. Pursuing an understanding of ayahuasca has led to many exotic places that I would never have visited otherwise, from the jungles of the Amazon Basin to the laboratory complexes of the National Institute of Mental Health and Stanford; it has led to the formation of warm friendships and fruitful collaborations with many colleagues who have shared my curiosity about the mysteries of this curious plant complex.

These collaborations, and more importantly, these friendships, continue, as does the quest for understanding. Though there have been detours along the way, always, and inevitably, they have led back to the central quest. Often, after the fact, I have seen how those apparent detours were not so far off the path after all, as they supplied some insight, some skill, or some experience, that in hindsight proved necessary to the furtherance of the quest.

Just as ayahuasca has been for me personally something of a Holy Grail, as it has been for many others, I have the intuition that it may have a similar role with respect to our entire species. Anyone who is personally experienced with ayahuasca is aware that it has much to teach us; there is incredible wisdom and intelligence there. And to my mind, one of the most profound and humbling lessons that ayahuasca teaches – one that we thick-headed humans have the hardest time grasping – is the realization that “you monkeys only think you’re running things.”

Though I state it humorously, here and in other talks and writings, it is nonetheless a profound insight on which may depend the very survival of our species, and our planet. Humans are good at nothing if not hubris, arrogance, and self-delusion. We assume that we dominate nature; that we are somehow separate from, and superior to, nature, even as we set about busily undermining and wrecking the very homeostatic global mechanisms that have kept our earth stable and hospitable to life for the last four and a half billion years. We devastate the rainforests of the world; we are responsible for the greatest loss of habitat and the greatest decimation of species since the asteroid impacts of the Permian-Triassic boundary, 250 million years ago; we rip the guts out of the earth and burn them, spewing toxic chemicals into the atmosphere; at the same time we slash and burn the woody forests that may be the only hope for sequestration of the carbon dioxide that is rapidly building to dangerous and possibly uncontrollable levels. For the first time in the history of our species, and indeed of our planet, we are forced to confront the possibility that thoughtless and unsustainable human activity may be posing a real threat to our species’ survival, and possibly the survival of all life on the planet.

And suddenly, and literally, “out of the Amazon,” one of the most impacted parts of our wounded planet, ayahuasca emerges as an emissary of trans-species sentience, to bring this lesson: You monkeys only think you’re running things. In a wider sense, the import of this lesson is that we need to wake up to what is happening to us and to the planet. We need to get with the program, people. We have become spiritually bereft and have been seduced by the delusion that we are somehow important in the scheme of things. We are not.

Our spiritual institutions have devolved into hollow shells, perverted to the agendas of rapacious governments and fanatic fundamentalisms, no longer capable of providing balm to the wounded spirit of our species; and as the world goes up in flames we benumb ourselves with consumerism and mindless entertainment, the decadent distractions of gadgets and gewgaws, the frantic but ultimately meaningless pursuits of a civilization that has lost its compass. And at this cusp in human history, there emerges a gentle emissary, the conduit to a body of profoundly ancient genetic and evolutionary wisdom that has long abided in the cosmologies of the indigenous peoples of the Amazon who have guarded and protected this knowledge for millennia, who learned long ago that the human role is not to be the master of nature, but its stewards, Our destiny, if we are to survive, is to nurture nature and to learn from it how to nurture ourselves and our fellow beings. This is the lesson that we can learn from ayahuasca, if only we pay attention.

I find it both ironic, and hopeful, that within the last 150 years, and particularly in the last half of the 20th century, ayahuasca has begun to assert its presence into human awareness on a global scale. For millennia it was known only to indigenous peoples who have long since understood and integrated what it has to teach us. In the 19th century it first came to the attention of a wider world as an object of curiosity in the reports of Richard Spruce and other intrepid explorers of the primordial rainforests of South America; in the mid-20th century Schultes and others continued to explore this discovery and began to focus the lens of science on the specifics of its botany, chemistry, and pharmacology (and, while necessary, this narrow scrutiny perhaps overlooked some of the larger implications of this ancient symbiosis with humanity). At the same time, ayahuasca escaped from its indigenous habitat and made its influence felt among certain non-indigenous people, representatives of “greater” civilization.

To these few men and women, ayahuasca provided revelations, and they in turn responded (in the way that humans so often do when confronted with a profound mystery) by founding religious sects with a messianic mission; in this case, a mission of hope, a message to the rest of the world that despite its simplicity was far ahead of its time: that we must learn to become the stewards of nature, and by fostering, encouraging, and sustaining the fecundity and diversity of nature, by celebrating and honoring our place as biological beings, as part of the web of life, we may learn to become nurturers of each other. A message quite different, and quite anathema, to the anti-biological obsessions of most of the major world “religions” with their preoccupation with death and suffering and their insistence on the suppression of all spontaneity and joy.

Such a message is perceived as a great threat by entrenched religious and political power structures, and indeed, it is. It is a threat to the continued rape of nature and oppression of peoples that is the foundation of their power. Evidence that they understand this threat and take it seriously is reflected by the unstinting and brutal efforts that “civilized” ecclesiastical, judicial, and political authorities have made to prohibit, demonize, and exterminate the shamanic use of ayahuasca and other sacred plants ever since the Inquisition and even earlier.

But the story is not yet over. Within the last 30 years, ayahuasca, clever little plant intelligence that it is, has escaped from its ancestral home in the Amazon and has found haven in other parts of the world. With the assistance of human helpers who heard the message and heeded it, ayahuasca sent its tendrils forth to encircle the world. It has found new homes, and new friends, in nearly every part of the world where temperatures are warm and where the ancient connections to plant-spirit still thrive, from the islands of Hawaii to the rainforests of South Africa, from gardens in Florida to greenhouses in Japan. The forces of death and dominance have been outwitted; it has escaped them, outrun them.

There is now no way that ayahuasca can ever be eliminated from the earth, short of toxifying the entire planet (which, unfortunately, the death culture is working assiduously to accomplish). Even if the Amazon itself is leveled for cattle pasture or burned for charcoal, ayahuasca, at least, will survive, and will continue to engage in its dialog with humanity. And encouragingly, more and more people are listening.

It may be too late. I have no illusions about this. Given that the curtain is now being rung down on the drunken misadventure that we call human history, the death culture will inevitably become even more brutal and insane, flailing ever more violently as it sinks beneath the quick sands of time. Indeed, it is already happening; all you have to do is turn on the nightly news.

Will ayahuasca survive? I have no doubt that ayahuasca will survive on this planet as long as the planet remains able to sustain life. The human time frame is measured in years, sometimes centuries, rarely, in millennia. Mere blinks when measured against the evolutionary time scales of planetary life, the scale on which ayahuasca wields its influence. It will be here long after the governments, religions, and political power structures that seem today so permanent and so menacing have dissolved into dust. It will be here long after our ephemeral species has been reduced to anomalous sediment in the fossil record. The real question is, will we be here long enough to hear its message, to integrate what it is trying to tell us, and to change in response, before it is too late?

Ayahuasca has the same message for us now that it has always had, since the beginning of its symbiotic relationship with humanity. Are we willing to listen? Only time will tell.

+++++++++++++++

McKenna, Dennis J. (2004) Clinical investigations of the therapeutic potential of Ayahuasca: Rationale and regulatory challenges. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 102:111-129.
Dennis J. McKenna (1999) Ayahuasca: an ethnopharmacologic history. In: R. Metzner, (ed) Ayahuasca: Hallucinogens, Consciousness, and the Spirit of Nature. Thunder’s Mouth Press, New York.
Callaway, J. C., D. J. McKenna, C. S. Grob, G. S. Brito, L. P. Raymon, R.E. Poland, E. N. Andrade, E. O. Andrade, D. C. Mash (1999) Pharmacokinetics of Hoasca alkaloids in Healthy Humans. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 65:243-256.
McKenna, DJ, JC Callaway, CS Grob (1999). The scientific investigation of ayahuasca: A review of past and current research. Heffter Review of Psychedelic Research 1:
Callaway, J. C., L. P. Raymon, W. L. Hearn, D. J. McKenna, C. S. Grob, G. S. Brito, D. C. Mash (1996) Quantitation of N,N-dimethyltryptamine and harmala alkaloids in human plasma after oral dosing with Ayahuasca. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 20: 492-497
C. S. Grob, D. J. McKenna, J. C. Callaway, G. S. Brito, E. S. Neves, G. Oberlender, O. L. Saide, E. Labigalini, C. Tacla, C. T. Miranda, R. J. Strassman, K. B. Boone (1996) Human pharmacology of hoasca, a plant hallucinogen used in ritual context in Brasil: Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. 184:86-94. McKenna, DJ (1996)
James C. Callaway, M. M. Airaksinen, Dennis J. McKenna, Glacus S. Brito, & Charles S. Grob (1994) Platelet serotonin uptake sites increased in drinkers of ayahuasca. Psychopharmacology 116: 385-387
Dennis J. McKenna, L. E. Luna, & G. H. N. Towers, (1995) Biodynamic constituents in Ayahuasca admixture plants: an uninvestigated folk pharmacopoeia. In: von Reis, S., and R. E. Schultes (eds). Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline. Dioscorides Press, Portland
Dennis J. McKenna, & G. H. N. Towers, (1985) On the comparative ethnopharmacology of the Malpighiaceous and Myristicaceous hallucinogens. J. Psychoactive Drugs, 17:35-39.
Dennis J. McKenna, & G. H. N. Towers, (1984), Biochemistry and pharmacology of tryptamine and ß-carboline derivatives: A minireview. J. Psychoactive Drugs, 16:347-358.
Dennis J. McKenna, G. H. N. Towers, & F. S. Abbott (1984) Monoamine oxidase inhibitors in South American hallucinogenic plants: Tryptamine and ß-carboline constituents of Ayahuasca. J. of Ethnopharmacology 10:195-223.
Dennis J. McKenna, G. H. N. Towers, & F. S. Abbott (1984) Monoamine oxidase inhibitors in South American hallucinogenic plants Pt. II: Constituents of orally active Myristicaceous hallucinogens. J. of Ethnopharmacology 12:179-211.
Dennis J. McKenna & G. H. N. Towers (1981) Ultra-violet mediated cytotoxic activity of ß-carboline alkaloids. Phytochemistry 20:1001-1004

© 2006 Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Organic Wisdom

By Simon G. Powell

If one opens up a modern computer, the tangle of wires, chips and circuits inside are incontrovertible evidence that the system was brought into being by the action of intelligence. Indeed, the exact configuration of parts, their systematic organisation and embodied functionality reflect human ingenuity in its most advanced form. There can be little doubt of this especially with the advent of smaller and faster computers as well as their networking into powerful parallel architectures. Its seems nothing can stop this creative outpouring of intelligent design.

All this technological wile and engineering finesse is made possible by the human brain/mind complex. The reason for the term ‘brain/mind complex’ is because the human mind – the domain in which human intelligence arises – is intimately linked to the human brain. In particular the most recently evolved outer layer of the brain called the neo-cortex is thought to be bound up with our conscious intelligence. Although a naked human brain may look pretty dull in comparison to the inner parts of a computer system, a brain is in actuality far more complex in design. Instead of wires, microchips and silicon circuits, the human brain consists of many billions of living metabolising brain cells, each cell an exquisite manifestation of co-ordinated and well executed biological engineering that makes use of electricity (in this case electrochemically derived) just as machines use electricity. En masse, huge arrays of electrochemical neurons compose ‘wet’ polyneuronal circuitry which endows the brain with prodigious powers of computation (thinking, sensing and feeling) which leave silicon computer systems in the dark.
In short, the human brain is in an altogether different design league than are computers. It is far more advanced. And yet modern science denies that the brain has been intelligently designed. So whereas science accords computers and other machines with intelligent design, natural biological creations like organisms and organs (such as brains) are deemed to have arisen according to a non-intelligent process. We call this process evolution. The perplexing mystery is why we do not divine intelligence in the evolutionary process. Why does contemporary science insist that evolution is dumb and mindless when evolution has forged the most advanced ‘machines’ – i.e. brains and organisms – in the known Universe?

Artificial Intelligence and Natural Intelligence

To argue that the evolutionary process is an intelligent process is not to call into question Darwin’s original insights so lucidly spelled out in his Origin of Species but to reinterpret what the process of evolution represents.
In order to commence this reinterpretation we first need to understand exactly what intelligence is. How are we to define intelligence? Whilst there are many ways of defining intelligence, all involve learning in some form or another. For instance, scientists from a discipline like Artificial Intelligence will readily attest that intelligence involves learning, that the more a system – like a computer-controlled robot for example – can learn, then the more intelligent it is. Facilitate learning and you facilitate the development of intelligence and intelligent behaviour. Increase a robot’s learning capacity and you concurrently increase its (artificial) intelligence and its capacity to behave intelligently. If, for example, we compare the robots of 40 years ago with the robots of today, then we shall see that the principle reasons why today’s Artificial Intelligence robots are considered smarter than their predecessors is because of their improved capacity to learn. Take the Mars Rover vehicle that was employed by NASA during their 1997 Pathfinder Mission to Mars. This Rover was an advanced expression of Artificial Intelligence because it could learn about the Martian landscape in its vicinity so as to afford it effective locomotion. In other words, the Rover’s computational circuitry was able to learn and make sense of the Martian world thereby allowing the Rover to act in a sensible manner in a wholly novel terrain. The more sense a robot can make and the more it can learn, the smarter or more intelligent it is deemed to be. In short, learning and intelligence are indubitably bound together.
Now, if we concede that learning and making sense are the key hallmarks of intelligence then we must also concede that evolution is a form of intelligence since evolution is precisely a learning process. Over some 3 and half billion years, evolution has learned all the tricks of life – from metabolism, to visual perception, to photosynthesis. Every single feature of an organism is a manifest expression, or enduring record, of (natural) intelligence, written down in replicating DNA and expressed via bio-logic. So rich is the store of intelligence infusing the tree of life that we have copied numerous instances of it for our own benefit. We build aircraft whose airfoils were originally derived from bird wings. We make epoxy glues copied from the glues made by barnacles. We make photon sensitive solar panels in an attempt to mimic photosynthesis. And so on. In short, life is replete with wisdom accrued over millions of years and written down in enduring DNA, DNA and genes representing the established records of this organic wisdom much like Darwin’s notebooks contain the records of his intelligence as it unfolded over time.

Genetic Algorithms

It might be argued that this intelligence evinced by biological evolution over billions of years only seems like intelligence and that if we look more closely then evolution more closely corresponds to a form of ‘brute learning’ and not the kind of intelligent learning with which we are familiar. After all, since evolution depends, in part, on random changes in DNA then it seems to be rather ‘hit and miss’ since most changes in DNA will be harmful. How could such a hit and miss affair really be intelligent? Surely this is a brute force approach to learning and thus not indicative of intelligence at all?
To answer this criticism consider genetic algorithms. These are computer programs which simulate evolution inside a computer. They are used to quite literally breed solutions to complex problems. For instance, if you wanted to create an effective face recognition program that could differentiate between male and female faces, you could evolve it via an appropriate genetic algorithm. You take an initial population of candidate programs (which can recognise faces to a very primitive degree), measure how well each one does at differentiating between male and female faces, and then breed from the most successful one. This ‘breeding’ involves taking the more successful programs and replicating their underlying code – but with random changes. You then test the offspring population and then once again take the most successful one and breed from it. Repeat millions of times on a fast computer. What is the result? Well, the result is inevitable – namely that you eventually evolve a program with a maximised ability to differentiate between male and female faces.
Now, the question to ask is: do such genetic algorithms evince intelligence? Or are they simply demonstrating the action of brute non-intelligent learning? The answer which emerges when we look with ‘wide angle lenses’ is that such genetic algorithms are most definitely infused with intelligence. Firstly a genetic algorithm must be precisely configured in advance. This is done by shrewd software authors who have learned how to write the actual algorithms (an algorithm is basically a software program). Secondly, the computer hardware which runs the software algorithm must also be precisely configured in advance (i.e. designed and built). Viewed as a systemised totality including hardware, software and designers, a genetic algorithm running on a computer has (human) intelligence written all over it, in every circuit, chip and line of computer code. It might be a kind of exhaustive search approach to learning but it is a sure-fire way of being successful for impressive results are guaranteed. Indeed, this is why genetic algorithms are now used worldwide in industry and it also explains why the tree of life is so amazing. Once you have a configured system – i.e. Nature with its plastically linguistic DNA embedded in an environment infused with sensible law-abiding properties – and you ‘run it’ over time then, eventually, fantastic creations are wrought. If we focus on but one part of the system – like a random change in DNA or, in the case of a genetic algorithm, a random change in computer code – then we will not really see the intelligence involved. But if we expand our focus and view Nature as a total system then, like a computer system running a genetic algorithm, it is rife with the attributes of intelligence. In Nature, this intelligence comes to be overtly reflected through the evolutionary process in the same way that human intelligence is overtly reflected in the activity and final outcome of a genetic algorithm.
Consider the following which illustrates the intelligent learning process that typically constitutes evolution. It concerns the evolution of flight:
«It is usually thought that animals attained flight step by step from some primitive semblance of flying. Flying squirrels come to mind. Utilising taught wing-like flaps of membrane, a flying squirrel with outstretched legs can effectively glide from tree to tree. Moving our attention to the evolution of flight by birds, if we imagine that a linear evolutionary sequence of, say, 50 ancestral bird-type species (i.e. reptiles, or even dinosaurs) were involved in the evolution of proper full-blown flight, each successive species will obviously be more physically adept at flight. Each of the 50 successive species therefore embodies one closer step towards the realisation of refined flight. The entire sequential process can be seen as a learning process. Species quite literally learn to fly over time. Bio-logic learns the mathematical and engineering wisdom necessary to implement the precise muscle structure, muscle co-ordination and wing design required to achieve heavier-than-air flight. In more dramatic terms, one can say that avian wing structure and musculature clearly embody an acute ‘understanding’ of aerodynamics. If, however, you only concentrate your attention on but one species in this sequence of 50, you will not divine the learning. But if you focus on the entire process, the sequential progression, a natural but nonetheless intelligent learning process becomes apparent. To be sure, all evolutionary innovations can be viewed in the same way, whether we think of locomotion, sight, metabolism or any other biologically determined behaviour. In every case, a natural process of learning (and ‘understanding’) is synonymous with evolution.»

The Implications

So what does all this mean? Well, for starters it means that evolution can indeed be seen as an intelligent process, with so-called random variations of DNA being but individual events within a greater system which, in its totality, is patently not random but the very epitome of intelligent design. Which is to say that Nature, considered as a vast organised system, is precisely configured so as to foster creative processes – in the same way that a computer system running a genetic algorithm is precisely configured so as to foster creative processes. Whereas a genetic algorithm running on a computer system is replete with human intelligence, Nature is replete with natural intelligence, the evolution of the tree of life being an on-going manifest expression of this intelligence. Darwin’s groundbreaking legacy therefore resides in his discovery of the methodology of Nature’s creative intelligence.
According to this new paradigm, modern scientific teachings pertaining to evolution are totally misguided. Evolution is not some dumb mindless phenomenon but rather an on-going process of creative intelligence. Thus human intelligence is not the ‘highest’ form of intelligence that we know of for human intelligence stems from the human brain which itself stems from evolution – an eminently intelligent process that weaves more miracles than any human engineer. No-one can deny this. That many seemingly intelligent people do deny the intelligence of evolution reveals how alienated we have become from the natural intelligence which birthed us. It is high time we rediscovered the true glory of the natural world in which we live. Until we do this, until we reconnect with the immense wisdom within Nature, until we concede that we are not as smart as the system which created us, then we shall remain estranged from our roots and continue to suffer the consequences.

Simon G. Powell, author and musician, lives and works in London. His article is an extract from his unpublished manuscript «Natural Intelligence: Lessons from the Jesus Lizard.» His recent production is «Sacred Ground • Psilocybin Mushrooms and the Rebirth of Nature,» a 48 page booklet packaged with a 55 minute documentary film and music on CD-ROM, exploring the history and eco-psychological importance of psilocybin.

Scroll to top